Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 03:50
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Quia qui rem laborum itaque vel.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Jack Betts, ‘Spider-Man’ Actor and Spaghetti Western Veteran, Dies at 96 - Variety
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
What’s next?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Department of Homeland Security lists Buncombe County as 'sanctuary jurisdiction' - WLOS
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Margaret Cho: Ellen DeGeneres 'Not Nice to Me for Most of My Career' - Variety
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Mariners fall flat again: 'We'll keep fighting' - The Seattle Times
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?